I have notice recently more small typo issues or a some lack of clarity based on your summary of the original article. Examples in today's newsletter: "Booming sales United States prompted a reversal..." Shouldn't that read Booming sales in the United States. Also: "Suit
A lawsuit filed by the rapper RBX alleged that Spotify has deprived artists of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue shares, citing stream fraud and specifically arguing that the artist Drake’s performance on the platform constitutes evidence of that fraud. Drake became the first artist to achieve 120 billion total streams, but they allege that inauthentic activity was responsible for 37 billion streams from January 2022 to September 2025. The lawsuit claimed that there are individual accounts listening exclusively to Drake for 23 hours per day, though they did not make clear how they performed that analysis." This lacks clarity with the use of "they" which I think refers to Spotify, but the "they" immediately follows a reference to Drake being used by the filers of the law suit not Spotify.
I enjoy the newsletter and am a subscriber, but wondering if you may be relying a little too much on AI to summarize the articles.
I have notice recently more small typo issues or a some lack of clarity based on your summary of the original article. Examples in today's newsletter: "Booming sales United States prompted a reversal..." Shouldn't that read Booming sales in the United States. Also: "Suit
A lawsuit filed by the rapper RBX alleged that Spotify has deprived artists of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue shares, citing stream fraud and specifically arguing that the artist Drake’s performance on the platform constitutes evidence of that fraud. Drake became the first artist to achieve 120 billion total streams, but they allege that inauthentic activity was responsible for 37 billion streams from January 2022 to September 2025. The lawsuit claimed that there are individual accounts listening exclusively to Drake for 23 hours per day, though they did not make clear how they performed that analysis." This lacks clarity with the use of "they" which I think refers to Spotify, but the "they" immediately follows a reference to Drake being used by the filers of the law suit not Spotify.
I enjoy the newsletter and am a subscriber, but wondering if you may be relying a little too much on AI to summarize the articles.