By Walt Hickey
Doesn't a $1 billion dollars for something as massive as an underwater artic fiber network seem somewhat cheap? Especially when considering how the US gov throws around billions on other projects that seem to not have that much bang for the buck.
Doesn't a $1 billion dollars for something as massive as an underwater artic fiber network seem somewhat cheap? Especially when considering how the US gov throws around billions on other projects that seem to not have that much bang for the buck.