Re the home office story: it's important to note that the WSJ is editorially very much against remote work/work from home; this strongly colors their reporting on the topic and should be taken into account when reading.
In other words, this isn't a "look at this interesting Zillow trend" story; it's yet another "remote work doesn't pay and should be banned" story.
Re the home office story: it's important to note that the WSJ is editorially very much against remote work/work from home; this strongly colors their reporting on the topic and should be taken into account when reading.
In other words, this isn't a "look at this interesting Zillow trend" story; it's yet another "remote work doesn't pay and should be banned" story.
Re the home office story: it's important to note that the WSJ is editorially very much against remote work/work from home; this strongly colors their reporting on the topic and should be taken into account when reading.
In other words, this isn't a "look at this interesting Zillow trend" story; it's yet another "remote work doesn't pay and should be banned" story.
Fair, but I really do respect the WSJ's firewall between editorial and opinion.